|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bonhomme Carnaval
   |
Posted - 2009.05.01 15:16:00 -
[1]
What, you're saying Shar the troll is controlled by his emotions instead of controlling them?! How surprising! 
And what a great characteristic for an auditor... It goes well with his newfound unreliability!
Disclaimer : My opinion is based on unverified information and represents the opinion of your entire corp and alliance. |
Bonhomme Carnaval
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 03:35:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Ricdic
Originally by: LaVista Vista
I can vouch for BOTH Caleb and Ji Sama.
So are you stating officially right here that if either of these characters default or scam through this offering you will repay the entire debt or be responsible for the whole debt?
No he's not. He's saying that from his own experience they seem to be trustworthy. Also, investors sent their ISK to Caleb. Their ISK was not transfered to Caleb by the IPO manager without the investors' permissions.
By the way, you should try to be more professional, read : not putting words in other people's mouths like children do when argueing. |
Bonhomme Carnaval
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 19:05:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Bonhomme Carnaval on 14/05/2009 19:11:26
Edited by: Bonhomme Carnaval on 14/05/2009 19:09:33
Originally by: cosmoray
If anyone only invests "pending audit" they should keep their cash.
The OP can take reservations, pending audit, and once complete people can send their reservation money.
What has the broker done in this case???
Someone of no rep has held cash, and after the audit immediately handed it over. I thought successful audit meant that the OP would first answer any questions arising from audit. Not in this case, just hand the cash over.
Good luck to Ji Sama on this IPO but if any investors lose money you only have yourselves to blame on how you handled the IPO reservation process.
I hope you're talking about the investors being to blame, not the IPO handlers (note that I agree Caleb seemed to be pretty much unnecessary in this whole thing).
On the other hand, here are two meaningful paragraphs where the second is made pretty solid by the first.
Originally by: Ji Sama
If any investors feel i have not been forthcomming with information regarding this IPO.
They are free to exhange their shares at cost. i.e. 100%
I have had nothing but support from my investors
I never thought someone who tried to launch a 1 trillion ISK IPO could be legit but hey, what do you know... I think if this was a scam we'd know about it now. 
Kudos to Ji for doing something about the problems that come up instead of denying them or apologizing uselessly like some would do. (reffering to the 100% buyback offer for unsatisfied investors). |
Bonhomme Carnaval
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 20:37:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Bonhomme Carnaval on 14/05/2009 20:37:53
Originally by: Alex555
Buy high/sell low is a great thing, but I guess it is a bit hard to base IPO on that
I agree that buying high and selling low is not profitable enough to pay the investment + dividends + reasonable profit. 
(now I understand why some people try to trade and give up after losing their starting capital ) |
|
|
| |
|